News Desk, Amar Ujala, New Delhi
Published by: Amit Mandal
Updated Monday, 25 October 2021 to 03:50 PM IST
The bench fixed November 30 for the final hearing on the petitions, giving all the parties more time to complete their arguments.
He took seven rounds at night after taking the B.Ed exam.
– Photo: Amar Ujala
Listen to the news
Final hearing on November 30
The bench comprising Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh heard the petitions of Abhijit Iyer Mitra, Vaibhav Jain, Dr Kavita Arora, OCI card holder Joydeep Sengupta and his partner Russell Blaine Stephens. The bench fixed November 30 for the final hearing on the petitions, giving all the parties more time to conclude their arguments.
During the trial, Joydeep Sengupta submitted that Stephens’ lawyer Karuna Nandi was married in New York and that in their case the Citizenship Act 1955, the Foreign Marriage Act 1969 and the Special Marriage Act 1954 apply. He highlighted Section 7A (1) (d) of the Citizenship Act 1955, which makes no distinction between heterosexuals, homosexuals or homosexuals.
The lawyer said it was a very straightforward issue. Citizenship law is silent on the gender of married couples. All the state has to do is register. So we have no objection if the center does not want to answer.
The center said the term refers to marriage of heterosexual couples
However, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Central Government, contended that ‘wife’ means spouses and ‘marriage’ is a term associated with heterosexual couples and therefore there is no need to file a specific answer regarding citizenship law. No need. He said that by law, marriage between a biological man and a biological woman is permissible.