Pegasus spyware case: Committee has no ‘wand’, government has remained silent in Supreme Court, will reveal secret before committee!

Summary

Pegasus Spyware Case: Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Justice Ramanna, quoting George Orwell, said, ‘If you want to keep it a secret, you must hide it from yourself. Also happens. The right to privacy should not be infringed. This right and freedom of the citizens must be upheld …

Listen to the news

When the Supreme Court spoke of setting up a committee chaired by retired Justice RV Raveendran to prosecute the Pegasus case, people in the legal and legal field said it was a proud decision. Former Supreme Court Justice Deepak Gupta said the Supreme Court has done its job to protect the rights of citizens. The right to privacy of citizens should not always be violated in the name of ‘sovereignty and integrity’. The country should be proud of this decision of the Supreme Court. Congress MP Rahul Gandhi said he would accept the report given by the Supreme Court committee. Pawan Duggal, a senior Supreme Court lawyer and cyber affairs expert, said the path of the Pegasus Inquiry Committee was “challenging” and asked whether the government, which has remained silent in the ‘Supreme Court’, would say anything to the Inquiry Committee. This happens when there is no FIR in this case.

Not everything can be hidden under the umbrella of ‘national security’.

The seriousness of the Pegasus case can be gauged from Supreme Court Chief Justice Ramanna quoting George Orwell as saying, “If you want to keep a secret, you have to hide it from yourself.” The right to privacy should not be infringed. This right and freedom of citizens needs to be upheld. Pawan Duggal, senior counsel for the Supreme Court, said it was a historic decision. It is a matter of pride that in the present circumstances the Supreme Court has set up a committee to hear the Pegasus case without hearing what the Central Government has to say. The Supreme Court’s indication that the government is not hiding everything under the umbrella of national security is very clear. Now is the time for the government to determine the border for national security. Wherever there is a conflict between ‘national security’ and ‘privacy’, there should be coordination. In the Pegasus espionage case, the Supreme Court fulfilled its duty as a defender of the freedom of the people.

The Supreme Court Inquiry Committee is not a magic wand

The committee set up by the Supreme Court to investigate the Pegasus case is not a magic wand. Pawan Duggal said that there are still many challenges to come. Many questions remain unanswered, such as how the investigation will proceed, how it will proceed, and how the records will be summoned. While the Supreme Court asked the Central Government to provide documents or any other information in this regard, the Government remained silent. Now the same government will bring everything before the inquiry committee, is it possible? The stand placed by the Government before the Supreme Court may continue in the same stand before the Committee. We do not think the government will give up its stance. The investigation team is not to blame for the difficulties in such situations. For this, users named in the Pegasus spy case list must come forward. They give proof. Fully cooperate. The information is at the NSO server, but in this case the FIR is also missing. The committee has no police authority. Because of this it is not so easy to call it ‘NSO’. Can not force the relevant company.

The Israeli government or company may refuse to disclose

The inquiry committee may face not one but many problems. The inquiry committee set up by the Supreme Court has not yet decided on the status, extent or jurisdiction. If he had to take help from the Israeli government, he was not sure if he would get it. NSO officials who are manufacturers of Pegasus spyware will appear before the committee, which is yet to be seen. As Pawan Duggal, the Supreme Court has also considered beyond these challenges. In fact, in addition to investigating the Pegasus case, the Supreme Court is also seeking legislation to ensure that no system in the future violates the rights of citizens. The Committee may be given such directions or may also be required to submit a report on strong legislation. A law that protects the right to privacy of the people. Its intention is that at least once that law comes into force no other government will do such an adventure.

The central government should cooperate, Justice Deepak Gupta

“You can never risk the privacy or freedom of the press in the name of national unity and integrity,” Justice Deepak Gupta, a retired Supreme Court judge, told PTI. The limit must be specified. It is not surprising that the Supreme Court has had difficulty finding members of this committee. The Chief Justice wrote in the judgment that difficulties would arise in the selection of members. Since this committee works under the guidance of the Supreme Court, the government should co-operate. Speaking on the occasion, Chief Justice NV Ramanna said, “We have never backed down from protecting the fundamental rights of the people.” The Central Government Expert Committee on the matter has not been handed over for inquiry. Justice must be done. The Supreme Court should not be a dumb spectator. He said that national security requires surveillance on terrorism, but the rules must be followed.

Expansion

When the Supreme Court spoke of setting up a committee chaired by retired Justice RV Raveendran to prosecute the Pegasus case, people in the legal and legal field said it was a proud decision. Former Supreme Court Justice Deepak Gupta said the Supreme Court has done its job to protect the rights of citizens. The right to privacy of citizens should not always be violated in the name of ‘sovereignty and integrity’. The country should be proud of this decision of the Supreme Court. Congress MP Rahul Gandhi said he would accept the report given by the Supreme Court committee. Pawan Duggal, a senior Supreme Court lawyer and cyber affairs expert, said the path of the Pegasus Inquiry Committee was “challenging” and asked whether the government, which has remained silent in the ‘Supreme Court’, would say anything to the Inquiry Committee. This happens when there is no FIR in this case.

Not everything can be hidden under the umbrella of ‘national security’.

The seriousness of the Pegasus case can be gauged from Supreme Court Chief Justice Ramanna quoting George Orwell as saying, “If you want to keep a secret, you have to hide it from yourself.” The right to privacy should not be infringed. This right and freedom of citizens needs to be upheld. Pawan Duggal, senior counsel for the Supreme Court, said it was a historic decision. It is a matter of pride that in the present circumstances the Supreme Court has set up a committee to hear the Pegasus case without hearing what the Central Government has to say. The Supreme Court’s indication that the government is not hiding everything under the umbrella of national security is very clear. Now is the time for the government to determine the border for national security. Wherever there is a conflict between ‘national security’ and ‘privacy’, there should be coordination. In the case of the Pegasus espionage, the Supreme Court has fulfilled its duty as a defender defending the freedom of the people.

The Supreme Court Inquiry Committee is not a magic wand

The committee set up by the Supreme Court to investigate the Pegasus case is not a magic wand. Pawan Duggal said that there are still many challenges to come. Many questions remain unanswered, such as how the investigation will proceed, how it will proceed, and how the records will be summoned. While the Supreme Court asked the Central Government to provide documents or any other information in this regard, the Government remained silent. Now the same government will bring everything before the inquiry committee, is it possible? The stand placed by the Government before the Supreme Court may continue in the same stand before the Committee. We do not think the government will give up its stance. The investigation team is not to blame for the difficulties in such situations. For this, users named in the Pegasus spy case list must come forward. They give proof. Fully cooperate. The information is at the NSO server, but in this case the FIR is also missing. The committee has no police authority. Because of this it is not so easy to call it ‘NSO’. Can not force the relevant company.

.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: