Lakhimpur Kheri violence: Ashish Mishra’s bail application rejected, lawyer says – he was wrongly framed, he is innocent

Samvad News Agency, Lakhimpur Kheri

Published by: Vikas Kumar
Friday, 17 December 2021 09:13 PM Updated to IST

Summary

Awadhesh Singh, senior counsel for Ashish Mishra Monu, argued that he was being misled in the case. In addition to Sections 307 and 326, Sections 3/25/30 and 35 of the Arms Act, which are completely illegal.

Listen to the news

In the Tikunia violence case, Ashish Mishra filed a second bail application in the CJM court on Friday, which was rejected by the court. Bail application was filed in the CJM court after raising Section 307 against Ashish Mishra.

CJM acquitted himself in the court on Friday, requesting that Ashish Mishra be released on bail, on which in-charge CJM Mona Singh rejected the bail application after hearing Ashish Mishra’s second bail application, saying it was a significant matter. Let us know that the second bail application was filed in the CJM court on Friday due to the changed sections on behalf of the accused Ashish Mishra Monu in the Tikunia case.

Awadhesh Singh, senior counsel for Ashish Mishra Monu, argued that he was being misled in the case. In addition to Sections 307 and 326, Sections 3/25/30 and 35 of the Arms Act, which are completely illegal.

SPO SP Yadav, opposing the bail application, said the case was a serious offense of the session trial in which the district court had already rejected the bail application. In such a situation, the second application is not admissible on which the in-charge CJM Mona Singh rejected the bail application.

Range

In the Tikunia violence case, Ashish Mishra filed a second bail application in the CJM court on Friday, which was rejected by the court. Bail application was filed in the CJM court after raising Section 307 against Ashish Mishra.

CJM acquitted himself in the court on Friday, requesting that Ashish Mishra be released on bail, on which in-charge CJM Mona Singh rejected the bail application after hearing Ashish Mishra’s second bail application, saying it was a significant matter. On Friday, due to the changed sections, the CJM filed a second bail application in the Tikunia case on behalf of accused Ashish Mishra Monu.

Awadhesh Singh, senior counsel for Ashish Mishra Monu, argued that he was being misled in the case. In addition to Sections 307 and 326, Sections 3/25/30 and 35 of the Arms Act, which are completely illegal.

SPO SP Yadav, opposing the bail application, said the case was a serious offense of the session trial in which the district court had already rejected the bail application. In such a situation, the second application is not admissible on which the in-charge CJM Mona Singh rejected the bail application.

.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Comment